 Posted: Thu 21:14, 09 Aug 2007 Post subject: |
|
| Dear Neelay and Rafal Ji,
Thank you for the explanation. In my case although the baadhak isn't afflicted and exalted I still have seen some difficulties wearing a diamond for shukra though. Rgds Kris |
|
| Posted: Thu 9:42, 09 Aug 2007 Post subject: |
|||
Thank You Neelay! This case is really interesting, similar for Taurus Lagna Sani is lording ninth and tenth being badhaka. The answer is more simple than we can imagine: if that planet is afflicted then it behaves like badhak, otherwise like Yogakarakaa. |
|||
| Posted: Thu 2:08, 09 Aug 2007 Post subject: |
|
| Dear Kris,
Allow me to share what i know about it. A yogakarka is a planet whic occupies a kona and kendra in a rashi. For kumbha rashi it is Ve because it is lord of 4th and 9 th house. For Movable, Fixed & Dual Signs the sign of obstruction (Bädhaka) is the 11th, 9th, & 7th house respectively. Aquarius being a fixed sign badhakeh is lord of 9th, Ve. Regarding what implication it has, Rafal ji can explain better. till then you can quench your curioisty by reading this. http://srath.com/lessons/advanced/badhaka.htm Regards, Neelay |
|
| Posted: Wed 23:12, 08 Aug 2007 Post subject: Baadhak |
|
| Dear Rafal Ji,
Could you explain the anomaly on this principle?I think for Kumbha lagna Sukra being the 9th lord is a baadhak,how come this planet is a rajayogakarak too?In my case shukra is exalted in 2nd house,so why is still considered a baadhak? What are the essential rules for a baadhak? Rgds, Kris |
|